Does Empire Avenue Measure Influence or Popularity?

The Empire Avenue development team regularly discusses that the site measures your influence. However. what is influence, how can it be measured and does Empire succeed at that measurement? Of course, the developers with their market makers and influence scores are not the only arbitors of influence. Other members can pass this judgement when they buy and sell shares.

Next, the difference between popularity and influence. 

Ashton KutcherDictionary.com defines influence this way:

the capacity or power of persons or things to be a compelling force on or produce effects on the actions, behavior, opinions, etc., of others

Key to the concept of influence is the ability to affect actions.  This differs from popularity or likability which is about admiration and favour (although popularity may also provide someone with influence).  When we think about the amount of influence someone has we have to look at the breadth and depth of that influence.  Breadth refers to how many people can be influenced. Meanwhile, depth refers to how much influence can be exerted one person. It’s like the old joke, “A friend will help you move.  A REAL friend will help you move — a body.” 

Influence is measured by Empire Avenue through their market makers and influence scores. The specifics of these calculations are not known.  However, we do know many of the variables available to measure.  In terms of others’ engagement with you, these include the following:

  • The number of people that follow, subscribe, list, friend and otherwise connect to you on Empire Avenue, Twitter, Flickr, Facebook and now Youtube and Facebook fan pages.
  • The number of comments, shoutouts, tweets and retweets you receive.
  • The number of favourites and thumbs up your content receives.
  • the number of page views your blogs and Empire Avenue profile receive and likely the views of your Flickr photos and Youtube videos.
  • The likes and clicks your Empire Avenue ads receive.
  • The number and quantity of you trade transactions (likely just buys in you).

 

So, how good a job does Empire Avenue do at measuring influence? First, it is important to remember that Empire Avenue is only measuring social media influence and only for specific social media services.  Certainly, the site has decent information for measuring someone’s breadth of influence in those services, but influence depth is trickier.  If I am quick to post a new video someone else took of Justin Bieber, my post might get lots of responses from teenage girls, but I wouldn’t presume that I had much influence with them.  In this case, I would describe my post as popular, but not influential. The reactions would say more about the singer’s influence than mine. However, it would appear that Empire Avenue does not make such a distinction and that it does not have a mechanism to do so. 

This is not to say that sharing popular content does not have value, but it is different than providing original content designed to impact behaviour.  And yet, a funny one line joke copied from elsewhere could generate more reponse than an article that took hours to write.  The number of reactions can measure influence, but it can also be inconsistent. This is possibly the reason that Empire Avenue has not shared blog influence scores.

The purchasing of shares is perhaps meant to be a human counter-balance to the counting of reactions by Empire Avenue.  However, the market makers can have a huge influence on trading because trading tends to be at least as much about momentum as it is good content and influence.  A positive or negative market opening can dramatically change the number of daily net buys in a stock.  A slow day of trading also lowers that type of engagement which can have a knock-on effect to the next market maker calculation.

The influence measurement challenge gets even more problematic when you factor in the copying of content.  A site like Tumblr actually makes it easy to reblog someone else’s content and with their version of a newstream wall, users may never have to click through to the original posting.  Journalists will also tell you this is a problem with Twitter where a retweeter sometimes gets credit and an original poster does not.  (I have had people copy my content wholesale without attribution.) 

If Empire Avenue is just a game all of this is fine.  The rules are what they are and everybody is free to respond accordingly on a level playing field.  This means that you find that great joke and post it.  However, if Empire Avenue wants to sell itself as an influence measurement tool, it’s important for people to understand the limitations of the scores.  A study just released by Northwestern University found serious limitations of this type when using Twitter follower numbers as an indicator of influence.  Empire Avenue’s tools look at many more variables, but nontheless can tell you little about how many people would help you move a body.

Related posts:

  1. General Influence versus Empire Avenue Influence
  2. Your Influence In and Out of Empire Avenue!
  3. Fame Does Not Equal Influence on Empire Avenue
  4. Activity versus Influence on Empire Avenue
  5. Should You Care About Online Influence?

About William Pitcher

Bill is the founder of the Empire Building Network. He hails from Mississauga, Ontario, Canada just outside Toronto. For 23 years, Bill has been a fundraising consultant helping charities across Canada and in Europe conduct major capital campaigns. He is a total tech geek that took to Empire Avenue and blogging like a fish to water.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
  • http://www.influencier.com DARING

    I’ll help you move a body anytime Bill.

  • http://twitter.com/adrielhampton Adriel Hampton

    I am planning to do a “What Dups told me,” video in the near future, as I had a lot of the same types of questions you are posing here. I am really interested in an upcoming feature that will parse out how much of your value comes from the social media scores, and how much from the sales. It is the EA team’s contention that what seperates the site from others like clout is the share sales component – you are actually getting someone to do something when you move your shares, no matter how you do it (and the swaps that many don’t like are actually a small part of the trading activity). This is a very intriguing premise for measuring influence.

    • William Pitcher

      I agree that people buying your shares can provide an interesting new insight. However, to date, my share selling has been much more tied to my momentum than my content. To be sure though, there are people that loyally buy because of my content. Perhaps over time, this momentum focus will decline, but I believe more people buy because of the financial return you provide rather than the content return. Sometimes these two go together, but just as often it seems they don’t. Please understand though, I am not complaining, I have done very well because of both.